API Integration Patterns
API Integration Patterns
Choosing Your Approach
| Approach | When to Use | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| API (Claude, OpenAI) | Most applications, especially starting out | Easy, reliable, but vendor dependency |
| Self-hosted (vLLM, TGI) | Data privacy, high volume, customization | Full control, but operational overhead |
| Hybrid | Route by complexity/sensitivity | Best of both, but more complexity |
API Best Practices
Streaming
Always use streaming for user-facing applications. It dramatically improves perceived latency:
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
with client.messages.stream(
model="claude-opus-4-6",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain RAG"}]
) as stream:
for text in stream.text_stream:
print(text, end="", flush=True)
Retry Logic
- Implement exponential backoff for rate limits (429) and server errors (500+)
- Set reasonable timeouts (30-120s depending on task complexity)
- Use circuit breakers for sustained failures
Batching
For non-real-time workloads, use batch APIs (available from Anthropic and OpenAI) for 50% cost savings.
Architecture Pattern: LLM Gateway
Client → API Gateway → LLM Router → Claude API
→ OpenAI API (fallback)
→ Local Model (sensitive data)
└→ Cache Layer (Redis)
└→ Rate Limiter
└→ Usage Tracker
🌼 Daisy+ in Action: Layered API Architecture
Daisy+ uses a layered API architecture: Odoo's XML-RPC for internal operations, a FastAPI REST layer for external integrations (with Redis caching and model-level invalidation), and MCP for AI-native interactions. API keys protect all external endpoints, and the cache-aside pattern keeps responses fast without stale data. This three-layer approach means every type of client — human, traditional software, or AI agent — has an optimized integration path.
Rating
0
0
There are no comments for now.
Join this Course
to be the first to leave a comment.